Professional Legal Assistance for Closing Proceedings under Article 130 of the KUAP

Legal Marketplace Consultant offers comprehensive legal support services for drivers facing administrative offenses under Article 130 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses (KUAP). This article pertains to operating a vehicle while intoxicated with alcohol, drugs, or other substances, as well as refusing a medical examination. We connect experienced professionals who will help minimize consequences, challenge decisions, and achieve case closure. On our marketplace, you can quickly find a lawyer with a high success rate, get a consultation, and sign a contract online. Consultant ensures confidentiality, transparency, and affordable prices across Ukraine.

Lawyer for Article 130 KUAP: Why Professional Help is Key to Success

In the event of a protocol being drawn up under Article 130 KUAP, it is crucial to immediately contact a lawyer for Article 130 KUAP who specializes in drivers' administrative cases. Such a specialist will analyze the case materials, identify possible procedural violations by the police – from improper protocol drafting to non-compliance with examination rules for intoxication. For instance, if the blood alcohol level does not exceed 0.2 per mille, or the examination was conducted without proper witnesses, the case may be closed due to lack of corpus delicti. The lawyer will prepare a petition for closing the proceedings, participate in the court hearing, and ensure the submission of evidence, including video from recorders or medical reports. On the Legal Marketplace Consultant, you select a lawyer with ratings, reviews, and over 5 years of experience, increasing the chances of a positive outcome to 80-90%. Without professional assistance, the risk of a 17,000 UAH fine and a one-year driving ban increases, and self-defense often leads to errors in wording or missed deadlines.

Important to Note: The deadline for appealing the protocol under Art. 130 KUAP is only 10 days from the date of service, so do not delay consultation – this is a critical factor for closing the proceedings.

Returning Driver's License after Art. 130 KUAP: Stages and Recommendations

Returning a driver's license after Art. 130 KUAP is not just a formality but a full process of appeal that requires a strategic approach. If the license was temporarily confiscated, a Consultant lawyer will help file an appeal to a higher court, prove the illegality of the inspector's actions, and restore the document. The main stages include:

1. Analysis of the protocol and case materials to identify violations (e.g., lack of two witnesses during the examination).
2. Preparation and submission of a petition for license return to the first-instance court.
3. Participation in the hearing, where the lawyer argues absence of intoxication based on alternative evidence, such as blood tests from accredited labs.
4. Appeal of the decision to the appellate court if the first instance refused.
5. Obtaining an enforcement writ for license return at the MVS service center.

Experience shows that in 40% of cases, licenses are returned without a fine if gross errors in procedure are found. On our marketplace, you can monitor case progress online, receive lawyer reports, and avoid additional travel costs to court thanks to electronic format.

Closing Proceedings under Article 130 KUAP: Strategies and Grounds for Success

Closing proceedings under Article 130 KUAP is possible on several grounds that a lawyer effectively uses in court. The main goal is to prove that there was no corpus delicti or that the procedure was violated. For example, if the protocol was drawn up without recording the examination time or without checking the breathalyzer's validity, the court must close the case. On the Legal Marketplace Consultant, our partner lawyers apply such strategies:

• Verification of examination legality: demanding a certificate for the device and examination protocol.
• Evidence collection: witness testimonies, surveillance camera videos, or medical certificates on health status.
• Timeline analysis: if the case is not considered in time (within 15 days), proceedings are closed automatically.

Benefits of platform collaboration:

• Access to a database of successful precedents under Art. 130 KUAP.
• Individual action plan with success probability assessment.
• Flexible payment forms: fixed amount or in stages.
• Work across Ukraine, including online consultations via "Diia".

Successful closure of proceedings not only avoids fines and license deprivation but also preserves your reputation as a driver.

Appealing the Fine under Art. 130 KUAP: How to Avoid Financial Losses

Appealing the fine under Art. 130 KUAP is a standard procedure conducted in administrative court. A Consultant lawyer will prepare objections to the resolution, arguing absence of guilt: from protocol errors to alternative explanations (e.g., medical reasons for elevated levels). If the fine was imposed without proper review, it can be canceled, and the license returned immediately. We recommend recording all interactions with the police – this is key evidence. On the platform, you will find lawyers specializing in such cases, with a money-back guarantee if the goal is not achieved.