image

TCC and JV ignores the postponement of the booked: can it be appealed in court?

Greetings 👋

My name is Alexander, I am your personal manager. Let me help you!

image
image

TCC and JV ignores the postponement of the booked: can it be appealed in court?

The updated reservation procedure has been in effect for over a year. It enables businesses to apply for the reservation of critical workers and receive a temporary reprieve from mobilization for them. However, in practice, situations often arise when the TCC and SP ignore the booking of such persons and hand them summonses or immediately mobilize them. The business is challenging it in court, so we can already talk about a certain judicial practice regarding this category of cases.

 

Legal depth of the problem

The general rule is that reserved persons are not subject to conscription for military service during mobilization.

Confirmation of the deferment of a conscript is an extract certified by the signature of the manager and the seal of the enterprise. At the same time, in practice, confirmation of deferment in the sense of the TCC and SP is the placing of a person on special military registration. According to the procedure of TCC and JV, it is a body that registers persons for special registration and can deny the enterprise such registration if it finds errors in the decision on booking from the Ministry of Economy.

Read also: TCC started calling citizens who have reached the age of 25 to clarify data

The booking procedure provides a clear list of such errors:

• incorrect information about a person's name;

•         year of birth;

• VOS (profile);

• name (full and abbreviated);

• location and EDRPOU code of the enterprise.

An inaccuracy in the civil position, military rank, name of the TCC and joint venture at the place of registration of the enterprise or conscript is not included in the list of errors and is not a reason to refuse a reservation.At the same time, often the TCC and SP, referring to the need to update military registration data, refuse to recognize the reservation, call it invalid, talk about its cancellation and try to hand out a "combat" summons or immediately mobilize the person.

The legal uncertainty of this issue lies in the fact that the TCC and SP are not the authorized body to cancel the deferment. Such a body is the Ministry of Economy. Moreover, errors in the decision of the Ministry of Economy are not listed among the reasons for canceling the postponement. Such a reason is primarily the release of a person, and therefore, purely legally, the extract about the reservation remains valid, despite the reluctance of the TCC and the JV to issue a special record.

 You may be interested in reading articles on the following topics: collection of debt from wages recovery of wages through court recovery of wage arrears recovery of wages recovery of wages in court recovery of wages through court

Proper way to protect the booked

One of the ways to protect what has been reserved is to go to court, in particular, with a demand to declare the actions of the TCC and SP illegal. Here are some examples of such court decisions.

1. The Dnipropetrovsk District Administrative Court (contested in the appeal) considered the case based on the claim of the person whom the TCC and SP tried to mobilize for the sake of the current reservation. The TCC and SP ignored the reservation documents, the person refused to receive a "combat" summons, about which an act was drawn up refusal The person turned to the court with a demand to declare the refusal of the TCC and the JV to grant a postponement illegal and oblige it to make a decision on the postponement.

The court agreed with the plaintiff's arguments and emphasized that his rights are subject to protection in such a way as "recognizing the unlawful inaction of the TCC and the JV, which consists in not granting a deferment from the draft for mobilization and to oblige the TCC and the JV to make a decision on granting a person a deferment from the draft for mobilization" on the basis of the Law of Ukraine dated October 21, 1993 No. 3543-XII "On mobilization training and mobilization".

2. Somewhat similar, but not so positive in terms of the outcome (at the time the case was considered, the person's reservation had expired) is a case that was considered by the Kharkiv District Administrative Court (not appealed). Thus, the plaintiff, after receiving the reservation, applied to the TCC and SP to update the military registration document and place it on special registration. However, the TCC and JV did not recognize the plaintiff's booking and handed him a summons to pass the VLC.

The plaintiff contested such inactivity of the TCC and the JV, and the court, partially satisfying the claim, established that the TCC and JV did not provide any norm that would give it the right to assess the legality of accepting the orders of the Ministry of Economy, and went beyond its powers by not fulfilling the current order of the Ministry of Economy.

Provision of the reserved claim

The Kharkiv case is also interesting in that within it the application to secure the claim by means of a ban on calling up the plaintiff for military service during the reservation period was satisfied.In addition to the specified case, there are also other positive examples in the court register where the courts granted similar applications.

For example, the Zhytomyr District Administrative Court (not appealed) in its decision prohibited the TCC and SP during the case review from taking actions related to the mobilization of a booked person, and came to the conclusion that "ensuring mobilization in Ukraine is an extremely important task in wartime, however in the specific case under consideration, mobilization should be a balance between the private interest of the mobilized and the public interest of the state. It is possible to find such a balance only after considering the merits of the case and making a court decision."

Another noteworthy procedural decision is the decision of the Donetsk District Administrative Court (not appealed). Thus, the court, satisfying the application of the reserved person, motivated its decision by the fact that "if the applicant is called up for military service during mobilization, in a special period, he will acquire a new legal status of a military serviceman, which will make it impossible to exercise the right to postponement, as well as make it impossible to execute the decision court, if it is accepted in favor of the plaintiff, since it is impossible to grant a postponement/reservation from conscription for military service during mobilization to a person who is already a military serviceman."The court also added that "...at this stage of the process, the court is not competent to provide an assessment of the legality of the actions of the TCC and the SP regarding the issuance of a subpoena for dispatch and the adoption of other actions or decision-making, however, in this case, the court states that without taking measures to ensure the claim, mobilization measures against the applicant will be completed, and therefore any decision in this case will not restore the violated rights that he emphasized."

 

Releasing the reserved person from the service

Indicative, but currently unpopular among the courts, is the position of canceling the order on mobilization and excluding the booked person from the list of personnel of the military unit.

Thus, the Seventh Administrative Court of Appeal (not appealed), canceling the decision of the first instance, made several important conclusions, in particular:

• not only a conscripted citizen has an obligation to notify the TCC and SP about the relevant booking, but also the TCC and SP are obliged to check and have information about booked persons in order to prevent illegal actions against the person;

• an extremely short period of time from the date of issuance of the booking order to the moment of conscription, so the plaintiff did not have an objective opportunity to provide the TCC and SP with relevant documentary confirmations of granting him a deferment from conscription;

• it is the authority of the TCC and SP to issue certificates of postponement of conscription for the period of mobilization and wartime.

Based on the results of the case review, the appellate court decided to recognize as illegal and annul the order of the TCC and SP regarding conscription for military service, as well as the order of the military unit regarding enrollment in the personnel lists, and ordered the military unit to exclude the plaintiff from the personnel lists.

A similar decision was reached by the Third Administrative Court of Appeal (not appealed) based on the results of consideration of the case on the claim of the booked person. In particular, the appellate court, leaving unchanged the decision of the court of first instance, found that the duty to verify the existence of grounds for postponement of conscription during mobilization for military service rests with the TCC and SP, and therefore it is they who must verify the presence or absence of the claimant's right to postponement of conscription for mobilization.Conclusions

The category of disputes related to the mobilization of reserved persons continues to be replenished with new approaches and views of the courts on solving existing problems. The current state of affairs demonstrates that the courts do not always "automatically" support the position of the TCC and SP, but also, in the balance of interests, hear the arguments of the conscript, especially when they are convincingly supported by documents.

Considering the level of attention to the issue of mobilization, it can be predicted that official positions will appear this year already at the level of the Supreme Court, which will then be adhered to by lower courts. There will also be adjustments in the approaches and positions of the courts due to expected changes in mobilization legislation and reservation procedures.

image
It could be interesting

Similar services and articles

image
receive a service

In the CONSULTANT mobile app

Secure Transaction

As a Client, you are freed from all financial risks when collaborating with Contractors, as the payment amount is reserved by our service and is paid to the Contractor only after receiving confirmation from you about the completion of the stage.

If the service is not provided, the funds are returned to you. The service takes on all financial risks and acts as a guarantor and custodian of funds, and in case of disputes between the parties, acts as an independent Arbitrator.

Your money is in safe hands!

image
Reviews

From Real Users

  • ВР
    Володя Ралець

    Всім хто має проблеми з кредиторами , раджу звертатись за допомогою саме до цих консультантів . Тут в отримаєте і підтримку і дуже якісні поради . Стосовно вирішення проблем по кредитах

  • ММ
    Макс Миловский

    Ніколи не думав, що вирішення юридичних питань може бути таким легким! За допомогою цієї програми я швидко знайшов компетентного юриста, який допоміг мені впоратися з моєю проблемою. Дуже зручно та ефективно

  • ЯЛ
    Янош Лоренц

    Корисний додаток та хороша компанія в якій спеціалісти допоможуть та надададуть професійні відповіді на всі ваші запитання.

  • НІ
    Наталія Іващенко

    Сподобалось відношення і професійний підхід до справи,все на вищому рівні,дякую

  • RB
    RB28

    Чудовий додаток. Дуже допомогли)

  • АД
    Анна Д.

    Досить зрозумілий додаток, зручний у користуванні

  • БА
    Барин

    Допомогли вирішити питання з працівниками ТЦК, дякую

  • AR
    Archi_B

    Дуже простий в використанні додаток. Професіональні адвокати, та приємні консультанти. Рекомендую

  • AN
    And1kekkk

    Відмінний додаток! З ним я знайшов юриста за лічені хвилини. Зручний інтерфейс та багато функцій роблять його найкращим вибором для пошуку кваліфікованої юридичної допомоги.

  • AL
    albina309

    Завдяки цьому додатку я швидко знайшов досвідченого юриста, який допоміг мені розібратися у моїй правовій ситуації. Простий у використанні та результативний

  • SI
    Simpldimpl2

    Через додаток вирішив своє питання! Дякую

  • LY
    L.Yaro

    Дуже дякую за допомогу, рада що звернулась. Однозначно рекомендую, в наш час знайти достовірну інформацію дуже важко, але виявляється можливо))

  • ГЕ
    Герцог235689

    Доволі все добре працює. Почав користуватися недавно але вже задоволений. Консультантами задоволений. Дякую. Буду звертатись й надалі.

  • ДЛ
    Добрі люди

    Був у ДШВ. Отримав поранення. Все нормально, поставили на ноги, але не хочу бути тягарем для побратимів. Ротний сам запропонував звільнитись по сімейним. Тільки попросив правильно складений рапорт, бо їм наверх відчитатись треба. Зателефонував сюди. порадили юриста. Все за 2 дні зробив. можу радити іншим

  • ДД
    Даніїл Діхтяренко

    Звернувся по рекламі в інтернеті. Взяв консультацію і мені знайшли хорошого військового адвоката, який допоміг мені перевестись до іншої частини. Гарно працювали з документами та пояснили що і як. Рекомендую, висловлюю велику подяку адвокатам!

image
Top 10

PRO consultants

All consultants
  • PREMIUM 75.51 Топ 1
    image

    Студенцов Олександр

    Lawyer Ukraine / Kyiv
    і
  • PREMIUM 68.35 Топ 2
    image

    Grytsai Mykola Igorovich

    Lawyer Ukraine / Kyiv
    і
  • PREMIUM 59.94 Топ 3
    image

    Borevych Mariia

    Lawyer Ukraine / Kyiv
    і
  • PREMIUM 53.43 Топ 4
    image

    Одинцова Валерія

    Lawyer Ukraine / Kyiv
    і
  • PREMIUM 52.44 Топ 5
    image

    Baladyha Serhiy

    Lawyer Ukraine / Kyiv
    і
  • PREMIUM 49.19 Топ 6
    image

    Макеєв Дмитро

    Lawyer Ukraine / Kyiv
    і
  • PREMIUM 48.25 Топ 7
    image

    Khyzhavska Olesia Yaroslavivna

    Lawyer Ukraine / Khmelnitsky region
    і
  • PREMIUM 38.93 Топ 8
    image

    Миколаєнко Олена

    Lawyer Ukraine / Kyiv
    і
  • PREMIUM 38.29 Топ 9
    image

    Yulia Palagina Volodymyrivna

    Lawyer Ukraine / Kharkov region
    і
  • PREMIUM 37.38 Топ 10
    image

    Molchanov Oleg Viktorovich

    Attorney Ukraine / Kyiv
    і

We verify each specialist who signs up for our service and ensure the high quality of our services.
CONSULTANT - is a clear and largest ranking of lawyers and attorneys so that everyone can choose the best specialist in the right place and at the right time.

The rating of lawyers is formed on the basis of positively completed orders, your feedback, ratings
and comments. The rating cannot be bought: it is formed exclusively by users. TTherefore, if you need services, advice or preparation of documents from the best lawyers and attorneys - you can confidently trust our specialists!

image
bonuses

Contact us for a free consultation

Take the questionnaire and get ₴500.00 for a consultation

Answer the questions below and we will instantly transfer the ₴500.00 to your first consultation in the CONSULTANT mobile application. This means that the consultation will be will be absolutely free, and the lawyer will receive payment from our service. This ensures a quick and high-quality answer from several specialists at once. Examples of such of such consultations can be found below. Bonus accruals are limited in time, so do not do not delay - take immediate action!

  • 0 days
  • 0 hours
  • 0 minutes
  • 0 seconds
  • ukraine Ukraine +380
  • poland Poland +48
  • england United Kingdom +44
  • usa United States +1
  • other Other +
image

Thanks for registration!

Submit your questions via the mobile app

  • Is your question urgent?
  • Have you previously sought help from other lawyers?
  • Do you need a military lawyer or attorney?
  • Are you doing military service?
  • Do you need support at the TCCSP?
image
Important

About us

Cookies And Privacy

We use our own and third-party cookies to personalize content and to analyze web traffic.